x-insta-comment
`x-insta-comment` appears on schema objects and properties. Its value is a string. Used by a single provider across 2 OpenAPI documents. Observed values include `See x-insta-comment on awsSettings`, `due to a bug with the terraform provider openapi plugin this has to be a list in`, `No force-new since this is expected to be used in Terraform and we expect custom`, `All fields are marked as x-internal as they are all unchangeable. This model exi`. Consistent with data & schema semantics — this is inferred from where the key appears and what it carries, not from any published definition.
Where it appears
| Location in the document | Occurrences | |
|---|---|---|
| schema | 144 |
What its value looks like
| Value shape | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| string | 144 |
Observed values
Sampled from the specifications, most frequent first.
Providers publishing it
All 1.
Why this is not in OpenAPI
Extensions exist because a provider needed something the specification would not carry. Most of what they hold is not the API contract at all — it is operational metadata about the contract: documentation, lifecycle, policy, provenance, and now agents. That metadata is usually better placed alongside the contract, in an Overlay or an APIs.json index, than crammed inside it. See everything else doing the data & schema semantics job.