Mocking & testing

x-konfig-original-example

`x-konfig-original-example` appears on schema objects and properties. Its value is a string. Used by a single provider across 1 OpenAPI document. It sits in the `x-konfig-` namespace, so its meaning is defined by konfig tooling rather than by OpenAPI. Observed values include `1`, `2`, `false`, `true`. Consistent with mocking & testing — this is inferred from where the key appears and what it carries, not from any published definition.

Mocking & testing x-konfig- namespace derived description

How this description was produced. It is assembled from what was measured in the corpus — where this key appears in a document, what shape its value takes, the values observed, and how many providers use it. It is not taken from a published definition, because for most extensions none exists. Read it as evidence, not as a specification. If you own this extension and want it described properly, tell us.

627 occurrences

1 documents

1 providers

vendor-named

Where it appears

Location in the document	Occurrences
operation	48
schema	579

What its value looks like

Value shape	Occurrences
integer	219
boolean	52
array	6
string	287
object	56
empty	1
number	6

Observed values

Sampled from the specifications, most frequent first.

12falsetrue2020-01-011235Doe

Providers publishing it

All 1.

sage-hr

Why this is not in OpenAPI

Extensions exist because a provider needed something the specification would not carry. Most of what they hold is not the API contract at all — it is operational metadata about the contract: documentation, lifecycle, policy, provenance, and now agents. That metadata is usually better placed alongside the contract, in an Overlay or an APIs.json index, than crammed inside it. See everything else doing the mocking & testing job.