x-pattern
`x-pattern` appears on schema objects and properties. Its value is a string. Used by 6 providers across 184 OpenAPI documents. Observed values include `[\u0020-\uD7FF\uE000-\uFFFD\uD800\uDC00-\uDBFF\uDFFF\t]*`, `[\\u0020-\\uD7FF\\uE000-\\uFFFD\\uD800\\uDC00-\\uDBFF\\uDFFF\\r\\n\\t]*`, `[\u0020-\uD7FF\uE000-\uFFFD\uD800\uDC00-\uDBFF\uDFFF\r\n\t]*`, `\([\u0020-\uD7FF\uE000-\uFFFD\uD800\uDC00-\uDBFF\uDFFF]\|[^\S\r\n"']\)*`. Consistent with validation & constraints — this is inferred from where the key appears and what it carries, not from any published definition.
Where it appears
| Location in the document | Occurrences | |
|---|---|---|
| operation | 108 | |
| schema | 551 |
What its value looks like
| Value shape | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| string | 659 |
Observed values
Sampled from the specifications, most frequent first.
Providers publishing it
All 6.
Why this is not in OpenAPI
Extensions exist because a provider needed something the specification would not carry. Most of what they hold is not the API contract at all — it is operational metadata about the contract: documentation, lifecycle, policy, provenance, and now agents. That metadata is usually better placed alongside the contract, in an Overlay or an APIs.json index, than crammed inside it. See everything else doing the data & schema semantics job.