Data & schema semantics · Identity & relationships

x-speakeasy-entity-operation

`x-speakeasy-entity-operation` appears on operations. Its value is a structured object. Used by 4 providers across 5 OpenAPI documents. It sits in the `x-speakeasy-` namespace, so its meaning is defined by speakeasy tooling rather than by OpenAPI. Consistent with identity & relationships — this is inferred from where the key appears and what it carries, not from any published definition.

Data & schema semantics x-speakeasy- namespace derived description
How this description was produced. It is assembled from what was measured in the corpus — where this key appears in a document, what shape its value takes, the values observed, and how many providers use it. It is not taken from a published definition, because for most extensions none exists. Read it as evidence, not as a specification. If you own this extension and want it described properly, tell us.
988 occurrences
5 documents
4 providers
vendor-named

Where it appears

Location in the documentOccurrences
operation 988

What its value looks like

Value shapeOccurrences
string55
object933

Observed values

Sampled from the specifications, most frequent first.

DeclarativeSourceDefinition#createDeclarativeSourceDefinition#readDeclarativeSourceDefinition#updateDeclarativeSourceDefinition#deleteSourceDefinition#createSourceDefinition#readSourceDefinition#updateSourceDefinition#delete

Providers publishing it

All 4.

airbytec1conductoronekong

Why this is not in OpenAPI

Extensions exist because a provider needed something the specification would not carry. Most of what they hold is not the API contract at all — it is operational metadata about the contract: documentation, lifecycle, policy, provenance, and now agents. That metadata is usually better placed alongside the contract, in an Overlay or an APIs.json index, than crammed inside it. See everything else doing the data & schema semantics job.